We, as human beings, cannot exist outside of our cultural context. In Constructing the Self, Constructing America: A Cultural History of Psychotherapy, Philip Cushman (1995) states that
People can exist only within a cultural framework that is carved out of the sensory bombardment of potential perceptions and possible ways of being. The carving is done thought the use of cultural artifacts during the exercise of social practices, especially that of language (p. 23).
The cultural framework is carved out of a bombardment of perceptions and possibilities and is likened to the clearing in a forest: a domesticated space where a particular culture exists surrounded by this forest of possibilities. In the center of the clearing are the most well defined and accepted norms of the culture, the margins contain the least defined of the cultural standards, the fringe elements if you will, pushing slowly out into the forest of possibilities.
I wonder how this system looks once the individual element that each of us represents is focused into the equation. I think of how this system, this interlocking of cultural norms, would resemble a holonic structure, each part a whole in itself and each contributing to make up a part of a larger systemic structure. These structures in turn complete in themselves and contributing to a yet larger structure. Completeness nesting within completeness to create the body of the culture, the beast that lives in the confines of the clearing in the forest of possibility.
Each of us, as individuals and members of larger social and community superstructures, influences and is influenced by the whole. Information and power flows bidriectionally, from smaller parts to larger, from larger to smaller, and rhizomatically, contagiously, in a horizontal manner from individual to individual, community to community. We vote for politicians who make the decisions that empower or disempower us, we meet in community circles to share and experience transformative practices, to share, to heal.
Some of us as individuals, and the communities we are drawn to, are in the center of the social clearing. Safe people, they seem to me, although I know they are not. Their lives fit neatly into the social mold. They are straight, white, male (or a female firmly standing by her man), middle class, church going or blandly agnostic and scientific. They work, they own a house, they marry, they have children, they are grandparents, they buy a motor home and travel about, and they die. But some of us are on the circumference of the circle. We inhabit the ever and slowly changing edge between the possibility of the forest and the certainty of our collectively created and safe clearing. Weaving between the trees and the margin of the meadow we are sexually diverse: gay, bisexual, lesbian, transgender, gender bending. Our religious beliefs are not the norm, not handed to us, but hewn from our experiences, our observations. We may marry, we may choose to be alone or celibate, or to engage in polyamorous relationships. We push the boundaries, becoming aware of the atrocities in which our collective culture participates. We strive to see the imbalance, the ways in which we participate in the disemboweling of other countries, the infection of the environment we ourselves inhabit, the dismemberment of the world, the greed and power mongering and rape. We object. We cry. We cry out for change.
I wonder what we will do to pull ourselves, our community, our culture, into a balance that respects all lives, and all manners of being in the world. How will we expand the circumference of the clearing? How will we communicate the ideas that will save us, and our descendents? And what will they do to keep us from taking action?

awake
confused